The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2017 and by Race and Ethnicity
Women’s median earnings are lower than men’s in nearly all occupations, whether they work in occupations predominantly done by women, occupations predominantly done by men, or occupations with a more even mix of men and women. Data for both women’s and men’s median weekly earnings for full-time work are available for 121 occupations. The occupation with the largest gender wage gap is ‘personal financial advisor;’ in 2017, the median weekly earnings of women ‘personal financial advisors’ were only 58.9 percent of those of men’s, corresponding to a gender wage gap of 41.1 percent.
Altogether, there are only two occupations—‘dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers’ and ‘wholesale and retail buyers, except farm products’—in which women’s median earnings are slightly higher than men’s, while there are 107 occupations in which women’s median earnings were 95 percent or less than men’s (that is, a wage gap of at least 5 cents per dollar earned by men). During 2017, the median gender earnings ratio for all full-time weekly workers was 81.8 percent, reflecting median weekly earnings for all female full-time workers of $770, compared with $941 per week for men (Table 1). In general, the highest paid occupations have the biggest gender gaps and the lowest paid occupations that have the smallest gaps. All but one of the ten occupations with the largest gender wage gaps have earnings that are higher than median earnings for all workers ($860); five of the ten occupations with the lowest wage gaps or with a gap in favor of women have earnings below the median for all workers.
The Gender Wage Gap Between Occupations
Added to the gender wage gap within occupations is the gender wage gap between occupations. Male-dominated occupations tend to pay more than female-dominated occupations at similar skill levels. For example, women ‘elementary and middle school teachers’—one of the most common occupations for women and a female-dominated field—earn $987 (compared with $1,139 for men; Table 1). Men in ‘software developers, applications and systems software’—one the most common occupations for men and a male-dominated field—earn $1,863 per week on average (compared with $1,543 for women; Table 2). Both occupations require at least a bachelor’s degree. Tackling occupational segregation—men primarily working in occupations with other men, and women primarily working with other women—is an important part of eliminating the gender wage gap.
The gender wage gap and occupational segregation are persistent features of the U.S. labor market. Only six of the 20 most common occupations for men and the 20 most common occupations for women overlap (Tables 1 and 2). Of all women working full-time, about four of ten (38.0 percent) work in female-dominated occupations and almost half of men (47.6 percent) work in male-dominated occupations. Only 6.6 percent of women work in male-dominated occupations, while only 4.7 percent of men work in female-dominated occupations.
Women Earn Less than Men in All the Most Common Occupations for Women
Table 1 shows the median weekly earnings and the gender earnings ratio in the 20 most common occupations for full-time working women. The occupations together employ 40.7 percent of women and 15.1 percent of men working full-time. The three largest occupations—‘registered nurses,’ ‘elementary and middle school teachers,’ and ‘secretaries and administrative assistants’—together employ 13.0 percent of all women. Ten of these 20 large occupations are female-dominated.
Within the 20 most common occupations for women, median full-time weekly earnings for women range from $1,251 per week for ‘managers, all other’ to $422 per week for ‘cashiers’ (Table 1). Women earn less than men in each of the largest occupations for women. The gender wage gap among the 20 most common occupations is largest for ‘financial managers,’ with a gender earnings ratio for full-time work of 71.1 percent (corresponding to a wage gap of 28.9 percent, which amounts to $497 dollars less per week for women than men) and the second largest gap is for ‘first-line supervisors of retail sales workers’ with a ratio of 71.7 percent (corresponding to a wage gap of 28.3 percent or $252 less per week for women than men).
Women Earn Less than Men in All the Most Common Occupations for Men
Table 2 shows the median weekly earnings and the gender earnings ratios in the 20 most common occupations for full-time working men. These occupations employ 32.9 percent of male full-time workers and 20.3 percent of female full-time workers. Eight of the occupations are nontraditional for women, and in five of the 20—‘construction laborers,’ ‘carpenters,’ ‘grounds maintenance workers,’ ‘automotive service technicians and mechanics,’ and ‘electricians,’—there are too few women workers to estimate their median weekly earnings.
Without exception, women’s median earnings are lower than men’s in the 20 largest occupations for men for which data are available. Median full-time weekly earnings for men range from $2,415 for ‘chief executives’ to $481 for ‘cooks’ (Table 2). Three of the 20 most common occupations for men have median male weekly earnings above $1,500, including one, ‘chief executives,’ above $2,000 per week; none of the most common occupations for women has female median weekly earnings at that level.
All of the most common occupations with too few women workers to calculate the gender earnings ratio are middle-skill occupations, which require more than high school but less than a bachelor’s degree; across all middle-skill occupations, workers in female-dominated occupations earn only 66 percent of workers in male-dominated occupations.
Table 1. The Gender Wage Gap in the 20 Most Common Occupations for Women (Full-Time Workers Only), 2017
Table 2. The Wage Gap in the 20 Most Common Occupations for Men (Full-Time Workers Only), 2017
More than Eight Times as Many Women as Men Work in Occupations with Poverty-Level Wages
Low earnings are a significant problem for both male and female full-time workers, but poverty-level wages are much more likely for women than men. Among all occupations, 4.2 million women full-time workers are in occupations with median weekly earnings for women that are lower than 100 percent of the federal poverty threshold for a family of four, $478 per week in 2017; this compares with 0.5 million men in occupations where median weekly earnings for men are below this poverty threshold. These numbers rise to 13.1 million full-time working women, compared with 7.9 million full-time working men, when using the slightly higher eligibility threshold for SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) of $615 per week for a family of four.  Workers in these occupations likely experience greater poverty than suggested by their weekly wages. The poverty threshold refers to annual, and SNAP eligibility to monthly, income; using weekly earnings to calculate a poverty wage assumes that a worker can get full-time work for four weeks a month and 52 weeks a year; this may not always be possible in occupations characterized by considerable fluctuations in demand for labor and, hence, unstable earning opportunities.
Two of the most common occupations for women—‘cashiers’ and ‘maids and household cleaners’ (employing 3.3 percent of all full-time working women) have median earnings for all workers below the poverty threshold for a family of four; one of the most common occupations for men—‘cooks’—has such low median earnings for all workers (men’s earnings are marginally above the threshold). Seven of the most common occupations for women have median weekly earnings for women below the SNAP eligibility threshold; five of the most common occupations for men have such low median earnings for men.
Women Earn Less than Men of the Same Race and Ethnicity in Broad Occupational Categories
The gender wage gap differs by race and ethnicity. Table 3 provides median weekly earnings for women and men for full-time work by race and ethnicity in seven broad occupational groups. (The sample size in the Current Population Survey is not sufficient to provide earnings estimates by race and ethnicity at a more detailed occupational level, or for other racial or ethnic groups.)
The distribution of women across the occupations varies for each group (Table 3):
- More than one-third of Asian women, as well as one third of White women, more than one-quarter of Black women, and almost one-fifth of Hispanic women, work in ‘professional and related’ occupations;
- Black and Hispanic women are more than twice as likely to work in ‘service’ occupations as White women;
- Asian women are considerably less likely than other women to work in ‘office and administrative support’ occupations; and
- Hispanic women are the most likely group of women to work in ‘production, transportation and material moving’ occupations.
The size of the overall wage gap is heavily dependent on the racial and ethnic composition of the working population. For all occupations considered together, Hispanic women have the lowest median earnings at $603 per week (56.6 percent of the median weekly earnings of non-Hispanic White men—$1,065, Table 3). Black women have median weekly earnings of $657, 61.7 percent of the median weekly earnings of White men. Both Asian men and women have the highest median weekly earnings, at $1,207 and $903, respectively. The earnings ratios for Asian women compared with Asian men, at 74.8 percent, and White women compared with White men, at 79.7 percent, are lower than the gender earnings ratio for the whole population (81.8 percent), and the wage gaps (25.2 percent and 20.3 percent respectively, compared with 18.2 percent) are larger. The wage gaps between Black female and male workers and Hispanic female and male workers are smaller than that between all women and men.
Men have higher median earnings than women of the same race or ethnicity in each of the major occupational groupings, except for Black and Hispanic workers in ‘office and administrative support’ and Black workers in ‘natural resources, construction, and maintenance’ occupations, where the median earnings of women are slightly higher than same-race and -ethnicity men’s earnings (Table 3). The gender earnings gap is magnified by a racial and ethnic earnings gap. For example, Hispanic women in ‘sales and related’ occupations earn 69.9 percent of Hispanic men’s and only 49.6 percent of White men’s earnings in these occupations.
The median weekly earnings of Hispanic women are lower than the federal poverty threshold for a family of four in two occupational groups: ‘service’ and ‘natural resources, construction, and maintenance’ occupations, and they are just $1 above the threshold in ‘production, transportation, and material moving’ occupations. These three occupational groups employ four in ten Hispanic full-time women workers (39.6 percent; Table 3).
Tackling Women’s Low Earnings and the Gender Wage Gap
More than fifty years after the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made discrimination illegal, a gender earnings gap remains. Our analysis shows that women’s median earnings are lower than men’s in all the 20 most common occupations for women, all the most common occupations for men, and, indeed, in almost all occupations for which a gender wage gap can be calculated. Female-dominated occupations tend to have lower median earnings than male-dominated occupations, a pattern which has a particularly pernicious impact on the women who work in the lowest paid female-dominated occupations. Poverty-level wages are especially common for Hispanic women.
While low-wage work can be found across the economy, it is particularly prevalent in jobs that involve the education and care of children, the elderly, and the infirm, work that traditionally was done by women at home, and often continues to be done almost exclusively by women when it is paid. Many of these jobs are low paid even though workers are expected to have at least a high school diploma and some post-secondary certificates. If women were paid the same per hour as men of the same age, education, and rural or urban residence, poverty rates for working women would be cut in half.
To improve women’s earnings and reduce the gender earnings gap, women need stronger efforts to ensure non-discriminatory hiring and pay practices, better training and career counseling, and improved work-family supports. Public policy such as raising the minimum wage, which increases wages in the lowest-paid jobs, is especially important for women, and particularly women of color. After considerable progress in the 1980s and 1990s, progress towards the greater gender integration of occupations has stalled, approximately at the same time as progress towards closing the gender wage gap. Women need better access to well-paid jobs that are currently primarily done by men, and they need better terms and conditions, and better pay, for the jobs that are primarily done by women. Investing in the public care infrastructure will not only improve the pay and economic security of workers in those jobs, it will also make it easier for women and men with care responsibilities to stay economically active and advance in their careers.
Table 3: Median Weekly Earnings for Female and Male Workers, by Race and Ethnicity for Broad Occupational Groups (Full-Time Workers Only), 2017
 This fact sheet shows median weekly earnings for full-time (35 hours or more per week) wage and salaried workers ages 16 and older (excluding the self-employed) based on Current Population Survey (CPS) annual averages for the calendar year 2017. Earnings data are made available only where there are an estimated minimum of 50,000 workers in an occupation; many occupations have fewer than 50,000 women and/or men working within them and earnings data are not published; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. “Household Data Annual Averages Table 39. Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by detailed occupation and sex.” <http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.pdf> (accessed March 28, 2018).
 The occupation of ‘personal financial advisors’ is 32.9 percent female, with median weekly earnings for full-time work of $979 for women and $1,662 for men; three other occupations—‘ administrative services managers,’ ‘securities, commodities, and financial services sales agents,’ ‘emergency medical technicians and paramedics—have a gender earnings ratio of less than 66%; men’s median weekly earnings are higher than $1,000 in each of these; IWPR calculation based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018), as above.
 Because of small sample sizes, the specific occupations in which women earn more than men differ from year to year, and the earnings differences are not likely to be statistically significant. Most likely, the typical woman in any of these two occupation has more years of experience than the typical man in each of these occupations, which may elevate the typical woman’s wage. The occupation of ‘dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers’ is 41.0 percent female, with median weekly earnings of $481 for women and $444 for men, and a gender earnings ratio of 108.3 percent; median weekly earnings for ‘wholesale and retail buyers, except farm products’ (56.5 percent female) are $888 for women and $882 for men (an earnings ratio of 100.7 percent); IWPR calculation based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018), as above.
 Another measure of the gender earnings ratio based on median annual earnings for full-time, year-round work, which includes the self-employed and annual bonus and commission payments, was 80.5 percent (a gender wage gap of 19.5 percent) in 2016; 2017 data will not be published until fall 2018. See Ariane Hegewisch and Emma Williams-Baron. 2018. “The Gender Wage Gap 2017: Earnings Differences by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity.” Fact Sheet, IWPR #C464. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. <https://iwpr.org/publications/gender-wage-gap-2017-race-ethnicity/ >.
 See Ariane Hegewisch and Heidi Hartmann. 2014. “Occupational Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap: A Job Half Done.” Scholar’s Paper to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of the Report of President Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of American Women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor <http://www.dol.gov/asp/evaluation/reports/WBPaperSeries.pdf> (accessed March 2018). The Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act of 1998 defines a nontraditional occupation for women as one where women are fewer than 25 percent of workers; female-dominated occupations are those in which at least three of four workers are women; male-dominated occupations are those in which at least three of four workers are men.
 Teachers at the same level are generally paid similarly, and it is possible that the weekly wage differential of $152 shown here is due to women and men working at different job levels within this broad category for teachers, or possibly to more men than women taking on extra duties such as coaching or leading special programs.
 In 2010, differences of employment across occupations explained 32.9 percent of the gender wage gap and differences in the distribution of women’s and men’s employment across industries explained 17.6 percent; Francine D. Blau and Lawrence Kahn. 2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations” Journal of Economic Literature 55(3): 789-865
 See note 5 above for definition of female- and male-dominated occupations. When part-time workers are included, the share of women workers working in female-dominated occupations is lower, at 38.2 percent; the share of men workers in male-dominated occupations is also lower, at 41.5 percent; IWPR calculation based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. “Household Data Annual Averages Table 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity.” <http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm> (accessed March 28, 2018).
 When part-time workers are included, 5.5 percent of women work in nontraditional occupations for women, and 5.0 percent of men work in nontraditional occupations for men; source as note 8 above.
 See note 5 above for definition of ‘nontaditional’.
 See Ariane Hegewisch, Marc Bendick, Barbara Gault, and Heidi Hartmann. 2016. Pathways to Equity: Narrowing the Wage Gap by Improving Women’s Access to Good Middle-Skill Jobs. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research, (accessed March 2018); calculations based on median annual earnings for full-time year-round workers.
 The 2017 federal poverty threshold for a family of four was $24,858 ($478 per week for 52 weeks); see U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. “Poverty Thresholds.” < https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html > (retrieved March 2018). The 2017 SNAP eligibility threshold for a family of four is 130 percent of the federal poverty threshold, $2,665 per month ($615 per week); see U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2018. “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).” https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility (retrieved March 2018).
 When including part- as well as full-time workers, 9.2 million women work in occupations with median weekly earnings for women for full-time work below the poverty threshold for a family of four, and just under a million (989,012) men work in occupations with median weekly earnings for full-time work for men below the poverty threshold. A further 23.3 million women are in occupations paying them full-time weekly earnings below SNAP eligibility, compared with 11.7 million men in occupations paying full-time weekly earnings below SNAP eligibility.
 See Hegewisch and Williams-Baron 2018, at note 4 above.
 For an analysis of the largest female-dominated low-wage occupations, see Elyse Shaw, Ariane Hegewisch, Emma Williams-Barron, and Barbara Gault. 2016. Undervalued and Underpaid in America: Women in Low-Wage, Female-Dominated Jobs Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research <https://iwpr.org/publications/undervalued-and-underpaid-in-america-women-in-low-wage-female-dominated-jobs/ >.
 See Jessica Milli, Ph.D., Yixuan Huang , Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D., Jeff Hayes, Ph.D.. 2017. “The Impact of Equal Pay on Poverty and the Economy.” IWPR Briefing Paper #C445; Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research <https://iwpr.org/publications/impact-equal-pay-poverty-economy/>
 See Hegewisch and Hartmann, at note 5 above.
This fact sheet was prepared by Ariane Hegewisch and Emma Williams-Baron at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Financial support was provided by the Annie. E. Casey Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
|For more information on IWPR reports, please
The Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) conducts and communicates research to inspire public dialogue, shape policy, and improve the lives and opportunities of women of diverse backgrounds, circumstances, and experiences. The Institute’s research strives to give voice to the needs of women from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds across the income spectrum and to ensure that their perspectives enter the public debate on ending discrimination and inequality, improving opportunity, and increasing economic security for women and families. The Institute works with policymakers, scholars, and public interest groups to design, execute, and disseminate research and to build a diverse network of individuals and organizations that conduct and use women-oriented policy research. IWPR’s work is supported by foundation grants, government grants and contracts, donations from individuals, and contributions from organizations and corporations. IWPR is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that also works in affiliation with the Program on Gender Analysis in Economics at American University.